Reading
Passage 1
You
should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 1 -13, which are
based on Reading Passage 1 below.
India’s Modern Women
The
country’s younger generation is shedding submissive attitudes, wants careers,
and longs for wealth. And marketers are paying attention. When the first
American music videos and popular TV shows began appearing in Indian homes
in the early 1990s thanks to satellite and cable, many pundits predicted
Indian society would never be the same. For the first time, female viewers
saw independent, successful women and fun, sensitive guys. Sex and divorce
were openly discussed in these TV imports and couples kissed
passionately - then still a taboo in Indian TV shows and movies.
Indeed,
the impact on younger generations of Indian women has been profound. Whereas
Indian women traditionally have been submissive to parents and husbands and
valued frugality and modesty, a number of sociological studies show that young
Indian females now prize financial independence, freedom to decide when to
marry and have children, and glamorous careers. A generation back, women
would sacrifice themselves and believed in saving. Today, it is spend,
spend, spend. It is OK for a woman to want something for herself, and
people will accept it if she goes out into a man’s world making a statement.
Because
today’s young women are the key consumer group of tomorrow, these shifts have
big implications for marketing companies. And the trends come out clearly in
two recent studies. One study examined 3,400 unmarried women aged 19-22 of
different income and social levels. Altogether, the project involved 40
focus groups in five large urban areas and five smaller cities. In some
cases, the researchers lived with the women for a while to study them more
closely. The researchers supplemented this data with interviews of
journalists, teachers, and psychologists.
Among
the findings:
-
Guilt-free materialism. 51% of young single women in major
urban areas say it is necessary to have a big house and big car to be happy. In
smaller cities, 86% agreed with this statement. This shows that the less
women have, the greater are their aspirations. One woman interviewed was
making just $200 a year but said she wants to own a jet plane. A typical
comment in recent interviews was, ‘I want money, fame, and success.'
-
Parental ties. Traditionally, parents regarded girls as somebody else’s future
property. They arranged marriages for their daughters, and then the daughters
would go away and take care of their in-laws, so parents needed and doted
on sons. However, today’s young women are rebelling against that. 67% say
they plan to take care of their parents into their old age - and that
means they need money. The company Unilever played on that sentiment with a
recent controversial - but successful - ad for its Fair and Lovely line of
beauty products. A daughter came home and found that her parents had no
sugar for coffee because they couldn’t afford it. She became an airline hostess
after using the Fair and Lovely products to make her beautiful. She then
visited her parents and took them to a first-class restaurant.
-
Marital freedom. Now, many women say they will marry when
ready - not when their parents decide to marry them off. 65% say dating is
essential, and they also want to become financially independent before
they marry. 76% say they want to maintain that independence afterwards. 60% say
they will decide how to spend their own salaries. What is more, 76% say
they will decide when to have children. They now regard this as the woman’s
decision completely. In big metro areas, 24% say they never want children, and
that number reaches 40% in smaller cities.
-
Individualism. Female role models in Indian culture used to
personify perfection. Now, 62% of girls say it is OK if they have faults
and that people see them. They do not want to be seen as Mrs. Perfect.
Popular TV role models are like Phoebe in ‘Friends’ - women who commit
blunders.
-
Careerism. A decade ago, most young women saw themselves as
housewives. After that, most said they wanted to be teachers or doctors.
If they had a profession at all, it had to be a noble cause. Now, it is
about glamour, money, and fame. A surprising 45% of young single females
say they would like to be journalists. This may be because prominent
female Indian journalists, especially TV reporters, are seen as very
glamorous. Another 39% say they would like to be managers, 38% are
interested in design, and 20% think they want to be teachers.
Interestingly, 13% say they would like to be in the military. The percentage
of those saying they want to be a full-time housewife is minuscule.
-
Modern husbands. The relationship with the husband used to be
one of awe. Now, women want a partner and a relationship of equals. A
recent Whirlpool ad shows a man washing the family clothes before his wife
comes home from work, while a Samsung home appliance ad shows a husband
and wife cooking together.
Questions
1-4
The
text refers to 6 main findings when young Indian women were surveyed.
Which
finding contains each of the following pieces of information?
1.
Young Indian women who want more tend to be poorer.
2.
Few young Indian women want to be housewives.
3.
Most young Indian women want to take care of their retired parents.
4.
Most young Indian women want to be financially independent.
Questions
5-8
Complete
the following sentences using NO MORE THAN THREE WORDS from the text
for each gap.
5…………………….are
freely talked about on American TV shows.
Young
women are considered to be the future’s most important 6……………………… by
many companies.
Most
young Indian women surveyed agree that 7……………………… before marriage is
necessary.
In
the past, young Indian women who wanted careers were most likely to consider
teaching or becoming doctors because each of these is considered to be 8……………..
Questions
9-13
Do
the following statements agree with the information given in Reading Passage 1?
In
boxes 9 - 13 on your answer sheet, write
TRUE
|
if
the statement agrees with the information
|
FALSE
|
if
the statement contradicts the information
|
NOT
GIVEN
|
If
there is no information on this
|
9
The effect of American culture on young Indian women was not forecast when
satellite and cable TV arrived in India.
10
Researchers used three methods to get their data.
11
Most young Indian women are aiming for perfection.
12
Most of the best journalists on TV in India arc women.
13
Modern men and women in India cook together.
Reading
Passage 2
You
should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 14 - 26, which are based on
Reading Passage 2 below.
Childhood Obesity
A. If
a child becomes obese, their body processes can change. Some of these may
be difficult or even impossible to alter in adulthood. Fat cells are
created in the first few years of life. If fat is stored quickly, more fat
cells are created. So an obese child can have up to three times as many as
a normal child. Eventually, fat cells stop multiplying, and an adult has a
fixed number for the rest of their life. The existing cells simply swell
or shrink to accommodate more fat. The amount of fat the body wants to
store is thought to be proportional to the total number of fat cells. So if
you were overweight as a child, your body is programmed to carry more fat.
This does not mean that you cannot lose weight through diet and exercise,
but it will be harder.
B. Few
health problems are observed in obese children, but they may develop conditions
that cause problems later in life, such as high blood pressure. They may
also suffer from 'sleep apnoea’. When this happens, soft tissue in the
throat blocks the airways during sleep. This can stop their breathing for
up to a minute. This process can happen hundreds of times a night, leading
to heart disease, memory problems, headaches, and tiredness. Some obese
children may develop diabetes. Normally, this condition only starts much
later in life. When it strikes, the body stops being able to process sugar
properly, and the cells are starved of energy. Diabetes cannot be
cured, but it can be treated. It may lead to problems such as nerve
damage, heart disease, kidney disease, and blindness. Children with this
condition will have to live with it all. their lives, increasing the
chance of problems.
C. Negative
body image can cause depression and social problems - overweight
children are often teased. Low self-esteem may not directly affect
physical health, but it is actually the biggest problem obese children
meet in everyday life. It may even lead to 'comfort eating’ (eating to
feel good), making the situation even worse. If modern-day culture placed less
emphasis on the ‘perfect body', then at least one set of problems associated
with obesity would disappear.
D. Although
the causes are not yet completely understood, it is clear to scientists
that both genes and the environment play a role, The recent increase in
obesity in many countries around the world seems to be linked to
environmental factors, Firstly, many people are much less physically
active nowadays. Secondly, fatty and sugary foods are more accessible to
more people. Thirdly, average portion sizes have become larger as people
have more food to eat and restaurants, particularly fast food ones, serve
larger portions for relatively little extra money. Fourthly, calories per
mouthful of food have increased.
E. Traditionally,
children all over the world have been forced by their parents to finish all the
food that is on their plate. Don’t force children to eat more when
they say they are full - otherwise they could lose their ability to
naturally regulate what they eat. Wait a few minutes before serving a
second portion of food at mealtimes. It takes some time for the messages
that tell us we have had enough to eat to reach the brain. Another global
tradition is that of giving children their favourite food as a reward for
good behaviour or good grades at school. Using food as a reward is never a
good idea because your child will learn to value these particular ‘treat’ foods
and may turn to food for comfort. Use non-food rewards instead - they
don’t need to be large material rewards. One of the best motivators is
praise! Don't tell your child off for being fat. Your child may already
feel upset about their weight. Telling them off will only make them feel
worse and may add to the problem if they then turn to food for comfort.
Don’t single out your child as the one with the problem.
Introduce healthier meals to the whole family. This way, everyone can make
healthy changes to their lifestyle.
F. It
is not worth forbidding fattening foods, because forbidding certain foods can
make them seem more attractive to children. Teach your child about the
health value of foods, particularly those that are rich in vitamins and
nutrients. Make your home a healthy food zone. Fill up the fruit bowl
instead of buying biscuits and crisps. Remember that your child is likely to
model themselves on your behaviour, so choose healthy food options
whenever possible. Offering a child a choice of food is generally not a
good idea. Research has shown that when there is more choice available,
we tend to eat more. Even the sight or smell of tempting food can override
the body's natural mechanism of regulation, so we eat when we’re not
hungry. If you do decide to offer your child a choice, keep the options to
an absolute minimum.
G.
Weight management camps can be a good way to treat obesity.
One of the problems is keeping off the weight that kids lose at such
camps. If the child comes home and none of the family members have altered
their eating habits, improvements may be difficult to sustain. Again, lead
by example! An increasing number of parents ask their doctors about
surgery (e.g. liposuction) to tackle obesity. If a child has massive obesity
and his or her health is being put at serious risk, then all options have
to be considered. Surgical treatments have shown good results in adults,
but there are serious risks. Performing surgery on children would raise
some difficult issues. This option should really only be considered when
all others have been exhausted,
H. Parents
of even young children can make sure the family changes to a healthy lifestyle
rather than targeting weight loss specifically. Children grow at different
rates, and many overweight children will ‘grow out of it’ as they grow
taller. Few treatments are targeted at children under the age of seven years.
From age eight to ten, a child who is obese should have a medical
evaluation to assess the severity of the problem. The older your child is,
the less likely they are to grow out of it. A 15-year-old who is overweight is
likely to remain so in adulthood.
Questions
14-17
The
text has 8 paragraphs (A - H).
Which
paragraph does each of the following headings best fit?
14
Feeling bad about yourself
15
Reducing weight
16
Age is a factor
17
Fat cells
Questions
18-22
According
to the text, FIVE of the following statements are true.
Write
the corresponding letters in answer boxes 18 to 22 in any order.
A
Adults do not gain fat cells.
B
Diabetes is not a permanent problem for a person.
C
Low self-esteem is a major problem.
D
Being obese is generally considered to be partly genetic.
E
Messages about food requirement go from the stomach to the brain instantly.
F
Parents should take the lead by buying healthy foods.
G
Performing liposuction on children is a good idea.
H
Some young children appear overweight when they are short.
Questions
23-26
According
to the information given in the text, choose the correct answer or answers from
the choices given.
23.People
suffering from obesity may suffer from
A
sleep apnoea.
B
diabetes.
C
low blood pressure.
24
Environmental factors contributing to obesity include
A
lack of exercise.
B
larger portions of food at restaurants.
C
comfort eating.
25
Bad things that parents do include
A
using food as a reward.
B
not telling children to finish their dinners.
C
waiting before serving second portions of food.
26
Forbidding foods is bad because children
A
will want them even more.
B
should be offered a choice of food.
C
should be treated equally.
Reading
Passage 3
You
should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 27 - 40, which are based on
Reading Passage 3 below.
Learning
about the Past
If
the past is a foreign country, the version that used to be taught in Irish
schools had a simple landscape. For 750 years after the first invasion by an
English king, Ireland suffered oppression. Then at Easter 1916, her brave
sons rose against the tyrant; their leaders were shot but their cause
prevailed, and Ireland (or 26 of her 32 counties) lived happily ever
after. Awkward episodes, like the conflict between rival Irish
nationalist groups in 1922 - 23, were airbrushed away. “The civil war was
just an embarrassment, it was hardly mentioned,” says Jimmy Joyce, who
went to school in Dublin in the 1950s.
These
days, Irish history lessons are more sophisticated. They deal happily with
facts that have no place in a plain tale of heroes and tyrants: like the fact
that hundreds of thousands of Irish people, Catholic and Protestant,
fought for Britain during the two world wars. Why the change? First,
because in the 1980s, some people in Ireland became uneasy about the fact
that a crude view of their national history was fuelling a conflict in the
north of the island. Then, came a fall in the influence of the Catholic church,
whose authority had rested on a deft fusion between religion and
patriotism. Also at work was an even broader shift: a state that was rich,
confident, and cosmopolitan saw less need to drum simple ideas into its
youth, especially if those ideas risked encouraging violence.
As
countries all over the world argue over “what to tell the children” about their
collective past, many will look to Ireland rather enviously. Its seamless
transition from a nationalist view of history to an open-minded one is an
exception. A history curriculum is often a telling sign of how a nation
and its elites see themselves: as victims of colonialism or practitioners
(either repentant or defiant) of imperial power. In the modern history of
Mexico, for example, a big landmark was the introduction, 15 years ago,
of textbooks that were a bit less anti-American. Many states still see history
teaching, and the inculcation of foundation myths, as a strategic
imperative; others see it as an exercise in teaching children to think for
themselves. The experience of several countries suggests that, whatever
educators and politicians might want, there is a limit to how far
history lessons can diverge in their tone from society as a whole.
Take
Australia. John Howard, the conservative prime minister, has made history one
of his favourite causes. At a “history summit” he held last August, educators
were urged to “reestablish a structured narrative” about the nation’s
past. This was seen by liberal critics as a doomed bid to revive a romantic
vision of white settlement in the 18th century. The romantic story has
been fading since the 1980s, when a liberal, revisionist view came to
dominate curricula: one that replaced “settlement” with “invasion” and that
looked for the first time at the stories of aborigines and women. How much
difference have Australia’s policy battles made to what children in that cosmopolitan
land are taught? Under Mr. Howard’s 11-year government, “multicultural” and
“aboriginal reconciliation”, two terms that once had currency, have faded
from the policy lexicon, but not from classrooms. Australia’s curricula are
controlled by the states, not from Canberra. Most states have rolled
Australian history into social studies courses, often rather muddled. In
New South Wales, where the subject is taught in its own right, Mr.
Howard’s bid to promote a patriotic view of history meets strong
resistance.
Judy
King, head of Riverside Girls High School in Sydney, has students from more
than 40 ethnic groups at her school. “It’s simply not possible to present one
story to them, and nor do we,” she says. “We canvass all the terms for
white settlement: colonialism, invasion, and genocide. Are all views
valid? Yes. What’s the problem with that? If the prime minister wants a
single narrative instead, then speaking as someone who’s taught history
for 42 years he’ll have an absolute fight on his hands.” Tom Ying, head of
history at Burwood Girls High School in Sydney, grew up as a Chinese child in
the white Australia of the 1950s. In a school where most students are from
non-English-speaking homes, he welcomes an approach that includes the dark
side of European settlement. “When you have only one side of the story,
immigrants, women, and aborigines aren’t going to have an investment in
it.”
Australia
is a country where a relatively gentle (by world standards) effort to re-impose
a sort of national ideology looks destined to fail. Russia, by contrast, is a
country where the general principle of a toughly enforced ideology, and a
national foundation story, still seems natural to many people, including
the country’s elite. In a telling sign of how he wants Russians to imagine
their past, President Vladimir Putin has introduced a new national day -
November 4 - to replace the old Revolution Day holiday on November 7. What
the new date recalls is the moment in 1612 when Russia, after a period of chaos,
drove the Catholic Poles and Lithuanians out of Moscow. Despite the
bonhomie of this week’s 25-minute chat between Mr. Putin and Pope Benedict
XVI, the president is promoting a national day which signals “isolation
and defensiveness” towards western Christendom, says Andrei Zorin, a
Russian historian.
In
South Africa, where white rule collapsed, the authorities seem to have done a
better job at forging a new national story and avoiding the trap of replacing
one rigid ideology with another. “The main message of the new school
curriculum is inclusion and reconciliation,” says Linda Chisholm, who designed
post-apartheid lessons. “We teach pupils to handle primary sources, like
oral history and documents, instead of spoon-feeding them on textbooks,”
adds Aled Jones, a history teacher at Bridge House School in
Cape Province. It helps that symbols and anniversaries have been redefined
with skill. December 16 was a day to remember white settlers clashing with the
Zulus in 1838; now it is the Day of Reconciliation.
Questions
27-30
For
each question, only ONE of the choices is correct.
Write
the corresponding letter in the appropriate box on your answer sheet.
27
The Irish Civil War was not taught much in Ireland in the past because
A
it didn’t fit in with the history of the Irish fighting British rule.
B
the Irish people couldn’t understand why it happened.
C
the Irish didn’t want to anger the British.
28
John Howard favours teaching history
A
as it was taught in Australia before the 1980s.
B
as it is taught in Australia now.
C
as it is taught in most other countries.
29
The new Russian holiday appears to demonstrate that Russia is
A
becoming less authoritative
B
strongly enforcing a link between ideology and history.
C
becoming opposed to the influence of western Christianity.
30
History in South Africa is now taught differently because
A
of the collapse of apatheism.
B
of the collapse of rule by white people.
C
teachers are better than before.
Questions
31-35
Complete
the following sentences using NO MORE THAN THREE WORDS from the text
for each gap.
Many
Irish people thought a simple view of history was 31……………………. in
Northern Ireland.
The
things that are taught in history classes often tell us how countries and
people 32…………………………
The
terms “multicultural” and “aboriginal reconciliation” can still be found in
Australian 33……………………..
Judy
King says John Howard would like 34…………………….. rather than look at
history from different standpoints.
In
South Africa, changing a 35………………. for another has been avoided.
Questions
36-40
Do
the following statements agree with the information given in Reading Passage 3?
In
boxes 36 - 40 on your sheet, write
TRUE
|
if
the statement agrees with the information
|
FALSE
|
if
the statement contradicts the information
|
NOT
GIVEN
|
If
there is no information on this
|
36
As Ireland became richer, Irish people became less interested in simple ideas.
37
Most countries believe learning about history should allow students to think
for themselves.
38
The meanings of the words “settlement” and “invasion” are not the same.
39
A foundation story is an important part of history classes in Russia.
40
The new South African history curriculum aims to include different standpoints
and bring people together.
Answer Keys:
1 Guilt free materialism
2 Careerism
3 Parental ties
4 Marital freedom
5 Sex and divorce
6 consumer group
7 dating
8 a noble cause
9 FALSE
10 TRUE
11 FALSE
12 NOT GIVEN
13 NOT GIVEN
14 C
15 G
16 H
17 A
18-22 A,C,D,F,H
23 A,B
24 A,B
25 A
26 A
27 A
28 A
29 C
30 B
31 fuclling a conflict
32 see themselves
33 classrooms
34 a single narrative
35 rigid ideology
36 TRUE
37 NOT GIVEN
38 FALSE
39 NOT GIVEN
40 TRUE
No comments:
Post a Comment